Archive for the ‘Comments’ Category

Support for Ending Means Testing

Tuesday, June 13th, 2023

One of the main points in the ComingTogether Plan is that means testing of benefits reduces the incentive for productive work, and therefore should be eliminated. Recently, two nationally known think tanks have joined us in expressing this concern. Hoover Institution fellow John Cochrane published a blog post making this very point on May 25, 2023. The Goodman Institute published an editorial in Forbes on June 1, 2023. It is publicly available on the Goodman Institute website here.

The Goodman piece makes reference to a paper by David Altig, Alan J. Auerbach, Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Elias Ilin, and Victor Ye that is similar to the “disincentive” analysis on our website, but is newer and much more comprehensive: Marginal Net Taxation of Americans’ Labor Supply. The authors use our methodology of treating loss of benefits the same as a tax and calculating a marginal tax rate based upon the combination of actual taxes and lost benefits associated with increased income. This new paper takes the analysis much further to look at long term effects. The paper gets rather technical, but read at least the Abstract, the Introduction, and the Conclusion. These sections particularly make clear the excessive complexity in our system of government benefits and taxation.

In the current situation with so many able-bodied, working-aged adults not participating in the work force, we really need to understand why that is the case and change the incentives so that more people are productive.

Like proposals like this

Thursday, September 9th, 2021

I really, really like proposals like this. They’re compassionate, efficient, and remove all the perverse incentives that come with cutting off benefits at certain thresholds. The rising popularity of UBI is an indication that there’s some appetite for this. My only worry is if a one-size fits all approach is realistic for a nation as diverse as ours. The cost of living in San Francisco is obviously very different from rural Oklahoma. Perhaps if states and cities could contribute to the benefits residents, that would help.

Submitted by wng.org user FIMIKI.

Wealth Tax

Saturday, December 26th, 2020

Comment received via Facebook: America’s billionaires could give everybody in the country a $3,000 stimulus check and still be richer than before the pandemic. If that does not convince you we need a wealth tax, I do not know what will.

Response: So people have no incentive to work and invest? (more…)

Just plug the Welfare drain completely

Wednesday, August 15th, 2012

Comment: The whole situation on trying to reform welfare is unnecessary and a waste of time if you ask me.
The country is not going to fix itself if  people who work hard for a living are forced to give some of their paycheck to the sluggards of our country who get paid to do NOTHING.  I agree that it was a system that was created to help people through hard areas of their lives (and I’m sorry for the people out there who actually do need welfare support to get back on their feet), but throughout time people have figured out how to take advantage of the system and how to keep receiving “FREE” money without having to do anything… (more…)

Health costs $$ because bureaucracy costs $$

Monday, July 18th, 2011

Comment: I also read that those countries with Socialized Medicine have much smaller populations than we do. Switzerland 8 mil, UK 62 mil, Canada 34 mil, U.S.A. 307 million. Just think of the bureaucratic nightmare and the opportunity for fraud. Even those small countries have problems with their care. I shudder to think what would happen here. (more…)

Safety net a good thought

Monday, May 16th, 2011

Comment: I like the idea of simplifying the welfare system in the United States and agree with paying cash to recipients and giving them discretion as to its spending. I believe we can get more cash to low-income Americans and lower the deficit because the current system is so ineffective. Here is a link to a more thorough analysis – http://www.federalsafetynet.com/welfare-reform.html (more…)

Weeding out welfare

Monday, May 16th, 2011

Comment:Am I the only one who thinks that there are too many people on Welfare?
Why not rule that if anyone in a Welfare household, gets pregnant or gets someone pregnant, then the Welfare household should lose Welfare.
Why not rule that if anyone in a Welfare household is arrested or charged with a crime, then the household should lose Welfare. (more…)

Lazy or smart?

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

Comment: Lazy mothers that depend on a check once a month is the worst woman in the world. What do they do all day? On their cell phones, getting their nails and hair done and their kids look a dirty mess. It’s so easy to get dependent on a check that comes once a month. It make them LAZY. (more…)

How long is long enough to pay for a crime?

Saturday, December 25th, 2010

Comment: I’m in need for help! It’s not fair for me to banded for life from foodstamps because i receive a drug charge under the act of addiction. I’ve serve my country and I’ve serve my time for my crime. I shouldn’t be punish for ever in the state of South Carolina for poss. of cocaine. I only had one little piece and got 18 mos. in prison. It’s been 7 or 8 yrs. and I’m still not eligible for benefits. I’m ASKing for help and fairness. Only a drug charge band you for life from benefits. Other charges like murder, robbery, and etc. your still eligible for food stamps. (more…)

Take care of US citizens!

Monday, November 15th, 2010

Comment: Whatever happened to helping United State Citizens! Our Social Services Department is a Joke. Believe me people in order to receive help you can be a ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT and receive any and all services no questions of legal status. You can own a $500,000.00 home and receive any and all services. But (more…)

Isn't this plan called “Socialism”?

Monday, May 17th, 2010

Comment: This plan is called “Socialism.”  Programs should not encourage sloth or entitlement attitudes – getting “something for nothing.”  It should reward those who work hard.  If everyone received basic needs automatically, many people would choose not to work, and eventually there would not be enough tax to pay for basic needs for everyone.  There are more poor (more…)

Help drug addicts?

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

Comment: I think that supporting a drug addicts habit is not beneficial to the whole public. If there were to be a welfare system that encompasses all Americans, we would have to regulate the monies distributed to the drug addicts. (more…)

A Personal Example

Tuesday, February 27th, 2007

Comment: I am trying to figure out why the system is geared to help the people who have no interest in getting up and working for themselves and their families? I am tired of trying to make it day by day on a slightly above minimum wage, no housing assistance (2-1/2 year waiting list), no child care assistance (I make $60.00 over the allotted limit), cannot get any bill assistance if an emergency arises (ex. car repairs), because I am not receiving TANF… there are no programs for those that are trying to succeed. (more…)

We like the efficiency you propose

Monday, October 11th, 2004

Comment: Your “Coming Together” program is an innovative proposal for streamlining social support in America, and very worthy of serious discussion. (more…)

A well-thought out plan, but it is too liberal

Tuesday, September 7th, 2004

Comment: I think this is a well-thought out plan, but it is too liberal in many aspects. I do not believe that certain people should have to pay for other peoples’ mistakes (such as the single mother). The mother decided on her own free will to have a child, even if that meant she was going to have to work harder. People become dependent on the government too often and that is a shame because government assistance should not become a crutch to people who mess up. I do, however, like that income tax idea because I think income tax brackets are unfair. (more…)

Would teens get benefits?

Friday, April 2nd, 2004

Comment: One question regarding this income is at what age would it become mandated. Would a 16 year old who wants to leave the authority of his or her parents be given the money? (more…)

Why include billionaires in the plan?

Tuesday, May 27th, 2003

Comment: Why should we give a few thousand dollars to Bill Gates? He does not need the money! (more…)

But the Bible says: "No Work, No Eat."

Saturday, January 18th, 2003

Comment: [This proposal] might concern those who argue the biblical mandate given by Paul that those not willing to work should not eat. A guaranteed income, even at minimal levels, might be a disincentive to a productive lifestyle. I would have to do more thinking about how a biblical view of human nature would square with a guaranteed income. (more…)

Your plan means more taxes for me

Saturday, January 4th, 2003

Comment: This plan would be quite a tax increase for me. I earn a six-figure income, but I have so arranged my affairs so that I legally pay well under 10% of that in taxes (including income tax and both the employee and employer payroll taxes [Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment]). (more…)

Not for conservatives, in my opinion

Tuesday, January 9th, 2001

Comment: I read the page and came away from it with one prevailing thought. Conservatives will not buy it. Although it appears to be a more up-front and efficient way to manage the redistribution of wealth that already occurs in our society, most conservatives prefer a reduction of that redistribution, not a more efficient way of accomplishing it. (more…)

Letting legislators know about this plan

Thursday, December 14th, 2000

Comment: Awesome idea! Do you have this in a WORD document that we can send to President Bush and all the senators and reps? (more…)